Published – Breast Reconstruction

NEW!

Use of TIGR Synthetic Reabsorable Mesh in Primary Breast Reconstruction

Fairman, Will; Nguyen, Jonathan MD

Published: March 2025

DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006622

Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Mastectomy and Implant-Based Prepectoral Reconstruction Using TIGR® Synthetic Mesh

Shiveta Razdan, Goran A. Ahmed, Gayatri Vishwakarma, Chwanrow Baban, Alexandra Tenovici

Published: May 25, 2024

DOI 10.7759/cureus.61052

Abstract

Comparing Complications of Biologic and Synthetic Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Young-Soo Choi, MD, Hi-Jin You, MD, PhD, Tae-Yul Lee, MD, PhD, Deok-Woo Kim, MD, PhD

Arch Plast Surg 2023;50:3–9.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan,
Republic of Korea

DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1964-8181.eISSN 2234-6171.

Abstract

Are patients most satisfied with a synthetic or a biological mesh in dual-plane immediate breast reconstruction after 5 years? A randomized controlled trial comparing the two meshes in the same patient

Anna Paganini, Susanne Meyer, Håkan Hallberg, Emma Hansson

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 75 (2022) 4133–4143Received 8 April 2022; accepted 16 August 2022

DOI:
doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.013

Abstract

Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Pre-Pectoral or Sub-Pectoral Implant: Assessing Clinical Practice, Post-Surgical Outcomes, Patient’s Satisfaction and Cost

Gilles Houvenaeghel, Monique Cohen, Laura Sabiani, Aurore Van Troy, Olivia Quilichini, Axelle Charavil, Max Buttarelli, Sandrine Rua, Agnès Tallet, Alexandre de Nonneville, Marie Bannier

Fortune Journals
Houvenaeghel G et al., J Surg Res 2022
DOI: 10.26502/jsr.10020250

Abstract
A Retrospective Study Assessing the Outcomes of Immediate Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant and Mesh-Based Breast Reconstruction
Thomas Wow 1 , Agnieszka Kolacinska-Wow 2,3,*, MateuszWichtowski 1 , Katarzyna Boguszewska-Byczkiewicz 3 , Zuzanna Nowicka 4 , Katarzyna Ploszka 4 , Karolina Pieszko 1,5  and Dawid Murawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133188

Abstract
First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study
Hansson, E., Edvinsson, A‐C., Elander, A., Kölby, L., Hallberg, H.
J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:80–88
〉〉 External  website
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26227

Abstract
Drain secretion and seroma formation after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh, respectively: A randomized controlled study
Emma Hansson MD, Ann-Chatrin Edvinsson, Håkan Hallberg MD, PhD
Breast J. 2020;26:1756–1759
〉〉 External  website
DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbj.13921

Abstract
Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage – 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts
Reitsamera, R., Peintingerb, F., Klaassen-Federspiela, F., Andreas, S.
The Breast: September 03, 2019
〉〉 External  website
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.08.002

Reconstruction mammaire prothéthique immédiate avec matrice synthétique resorbable

Marthan, J. (2019)
Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris Diderot, Dr Jessica Marthan, Institut Gustave Roussy

Abstract
Comparison of inflammatory response and synovial metaplasia in immediate breast reconstruction with a synthetic and a biological mesh: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Hallberg, H., Hansson, E., Burian, P. (2019)
〉〉 External website
DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2000656X.2019.1704766

Abstract
Immediate implant reconstruction using absorbable TIGR mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy
Edel Marie Quinn, Mitchel Barry & Malcolm Kell

〉〉External website

Doi: 10.1007/s00238-019-01603-0

Abstract
TIGR® Matrix surgical mesh – a two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions
Hallberg, H., Lewin, R., Elander, A., Hansson, E. (2018).
〉〉 External  website
DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1478841

Abstract
The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery : Is a resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Stefano Pompei, MD, Dora Evangelidou,MD, MRM, Floriana Arelli, MD, Gianluigi Ferrante, MD, MSc
〉〉 External  website
DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Abstract
De novo experience of resorbable woven mesh in immediate breast reconstruction post-mastectomy
Sharma, S., Van Barsel, S., Barry, M., Kell, R.M. (2016).
〉〉 External  website
DOI:10.1007/s00238-016-1227-1

Abstract
Bi-pedicle nipple-sparing mastectomy (modified Letterman technique) and TIGR mesh-assisted immediate implant reconstruction, in a patient with Cowden syndrome
Todd, J. (2016)
〉〉 External  website

Abstract
Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using the TIGR Matrix
Peter Schrenk (2016)
〉〉 External  website
DOI:10.22177bmt-2016-0003

Abstract
The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Reconstructive, Revision and Cosmetic Breast Surgery
Becker, H., Lind, JG. (2013)
〉〉 External  website
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-013-0171-8

Abstract
Three-year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics
Hjort, H., Mathisen, T., Alves, A., Clermont, G., Boutrand, J. P. ; Hernia volume 16, pages191–197, 2012
〉〉External  website Doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0885-y